Bitcoin, Property Rights, and Why The Old West Says You Should Own Your Socials

Today on the Brief:

  • A record week for peer-to-peer exchanges in the developing world

  • A digital dollar gets discussed in Congress 

  • Previewing the Federal Reserve’s FOMC guidance 

Our main topic: A brainstorm on digital property rights

Here’s a radical idea. What if by virtue of the fact that you had put so much time and effort into building a following on social media and filling that following with content you had legal claim to and distinct property rights around your corner of social media platforms? 

It’s wild in the context of today’s terms of service, but has significant legal precedent in the world of physical land. 

In this new type of deep-dive 20-minute episode we’re calling a “Breakdown Brainstorm,” Castle Island Ventures investor Nic Carter looks at:

  • The two schools of thought around digital property rights

  • The historical precedent for squatter’s rights

  • What the specific example of the USA’s Westward Expansion can teach us

  • Why this type of approach can be highly economically generative, according to economists like De Soto

  • How John Locke’s theories provide a moral basis for the argument 

  • Why today’s platforms are akin to anti-democratic feudal lords

  • How bitcoin provides a model and a mechanism for digital rights enforced on the protocol level rather than by a state or other external actor 

What the Robinhood Rally means for Bitcoin

Welcome to Davey Day Trader world.

Happy Tuesday!

A slightly longer form essay today. Hope you enjoy

-NLW


Why Bankrupt Company Stocks Are Pumping And What It Means For Bitcoin

At least when it was crypto markets going bonkers it made sense.

The bubble of 2017 had a lot of things going for it. Tokenization had created an entirely new mechanism that let people trade effortlessly. There was hype in the air and the promise of an entirely new technology movement.

When it comes to the stock market right now, it could give the crypto markets in 2017 a run for their money.

Let’s start with what’s happening in markets.

Since March 23, the markets have seen their largest 50 day gain in history.

In fact, not a single stock is down in 10 weeks.

Companies with no product and no revenue have higher market caps than Ford.

The shift in a matter of days has been remarkable.

And, as a Bloomberg piece put it "Everywhere You Look Under Surging Stocks Is Fervid Retail Buying”

So what’s the Robinhood part of this story?

Let’s start this with another headline - this time from CNBC: “Robinhood traders cash in on the market comeback that billionaire investors missed”

Robinhood is a stock buying app. It has 10 million users, 3 million of whom signed up during Q1 of this year. The average age of its users is 31.

To get a sense of the mindset of its users, here’s a quote from the above mentioned CNBC article:

“I just started taking it seriously about two months ago,” Godbolt — a New York resident— told CNBC. “I’ve been watching AAL since the beginning of that time and I felt eventually, once Covid relaxed, markets would move up.”

This generation of investors isn’t just embodied in Robinhood.

Before COVID-19 hit, a Bloomberg Businessweek cover story focused on the growing community on Reddit r/wallstreetbets - which was 900,000 members at the time and has surged to 1.3m.

Some have also called this the “Davey Day Trader Effect” after Barstool Sports founder Dave Portnoy, who began day trading to kill time and make money during the shutdowns. Dave’s part of the story - his embodiment of this cohort - brings us to our next point.

Where did the Robinhood crowd come from?

There are a confluence of factors that combined to make this happen when it did:

  • Extra time - many people out of work, no sports or hobbies to kill time with

  • Extra money - there is good evidence that stimulus money went right into the markets (instead of into for example deferred mortgages)

  • Cheap infrastructure - free trading has become the norm over the last year

What have they been betting on?

The strategy has been two part.

The first part is that they’ve simply (shocker!) made common sense bets. Pharma companies trying to address COVID specifically. Kids education companies (hello, home school!). Companies dealing with compliance in a post COVID-19 world.

The second part is that they’ve made a fundamentally different bet than some very storied investors about how long lasting the human behavior impacts of COVID-19 would be. While Buffett sold all his airline stocks, and others were cashing out of cruiselines and casinos, they were betting that people wouldn’t change their behaviors nearly as much and pumped those stocks to the moon.

The third part is the craziest, and the part we’ll get to in just a minute.

First, we need to discuss the relationship between this new cohort and the professionals.

The professionals versus the crowd

Famed investor Stanley Druckenmiller said this week that he was “humbled” by the equities markets. In the wake of his very public decision to drop his airline positions, Buffett has now been proven very publicly wrong.

Dave Portnoy made light of that in a clip from his most recent Davey Day Trader Global.

Amazingly, this got picked up by MarketWatch.

Holding aside the entire master’s thesis I could write on Portnoy and modern media, the resounding thing here is this: the Robinhood crowd does not care about professional investors.

It does not care what CNBC, Bloomberg, or any other financial MSM think.

It only cares about what its group of peers think.

And most of all, it only cares about the game.


The Bankruptcy Bet

This is, of course, best expressed in the Robinhood Revolutions strangest bet of all: bankrupt companies.

Could there be any more pure expression of capitalist market nihilism.

In a world where everything is about asset prices and number go up; where the Fed will do whatever it takes with their unlimited cash to ensure that no company can fail, why wouldn’t you take this all the way? Why wouldn’t you take greater fool theory all the way to its ultimate conclusion? Why wouldn’t you pump a zombie company more than 100% in a day?

There is a facade that we are a consumption-based economy.

We’re not anymore.

We’re an asset price economy. It doesn’t matter that the majority of people don’t own stocks, or that basing so much of our monetary policy on ensuring continued growth in assets rewards the already rich and punishes the poor and savers. This is simply the way of the world.

The Robinhood Revolution is both a pure and a cynical response to the game the Fed and our financial institutions have set up.

If the game is rigged, play it better than the pros.

After all, as Portnoy said, an asteroid could hit the earth and number would still go up.


So What Does It Mean For Bitcoin?

I see four possible scenarios:

1) The party continues and it crowds out space for crypto - in other words, if you can watch $10k in Hertz turn into $125k a few weeks later, who needs shitcoins?

2) Good for “crypto” - in this scenario, which involves stocks continuing up, at some point people start looking for other sources of alpha and move beyond markets to the altcoin casino.

3) Good for Bitcoin (specifically) - This is the scenario in which the party continues, but rather than just looking to diversify and find alpha, people are getting actively nervous about how absurd the traditional markets are getting and looking for something uncorrelated

4) Mixed for Bitcoin - This is the scenario where the stock party ends. The way it shakes out could be good or bad. The bad would come if people who have exposure to bitcoin get wiped out and need to sell off. The good would be that, depending on what type of crash or correction we see, there would perhaps be a push for more uncorrelated assets and alternative narratives that could benefit bitcoin.

Why War Reporting Is The Right Mental Model For Today's Media

Featuring Jake Hanrahan of Popular Front

Happy Monday, Breakers

We’re living through some of the most chaotic times in recent history. One of the challenges is that media has become one of the political footballs. Instead of trusted sources we have competing narratives.

At least that is, if you focus on mainstream media. When it comes to independent media, the landscape has never been more full of quality voices.

Jake Hanrahan is the founder of Popular Front - a podcast and media network focused on underreported and irregular conflict. He has been embedded in conflict zones from Syria to Ukraine to Kosovo and beyond.

In this conversation, we discuss the state of media, and why the world is so hungry for real, authentic conversations rather than the parroting of political slogans.

Check it out and thanks for listening

-NLW


What if the Fed is all PR and no power?

Featuring Alhambra Investment's Jeffrey P. Snider

What if, counter to the conventional wisdom, the Fed isn’t some money printing monster driving us on an inevitable collision course with inflation?

What if, instead, it is an impotent institution, with no real ability to address the most dominant force in the global economy: the eurodollar shadow banking system?

That’s the argument presented on the most recent Breakdown with Alhambra Investments Head of Global Research Jeff Snider.

Jeff is one of the most interesting and heterodox thinkers in the macro space. This is one of my favorite conversations I’ve had and I hope you enjoy it as well!

The Breakdown Weekly Recap | May 31 2020

Hi all,

Quite a week, eh?

Just a quick note sharing two things:

First, I’m going to be beta testing a number of new types of bonus content this month. If you’d like to participate, email me nlw@whittemore.io.

Second, it was a great week of shows! Check these out if you haven’t had a chance yet.



Loading more posts…